I was taking with Chat GPT about AI and machine language, and I asked it this meta question. I'm impressed that it understood:
but do you need to have seen an exact version of what I ask, or can you interpret it. For example, if I ask you to write a ruby function that takes a number, and adds 5 to it, and you do it, does that mean that in your training you saw a ruby function that added 5 to a number, or is it possible that you saw an example where you added 2?
ChatGPT said:
Great question! I do not need to have seen an exact version of what you ask—I can interpret your request and generate a response based on my understanding of patterns.
How I Handle This:
I break down your request into concepts
- "Write a Ruby function" → I know the syntax for Ruby functions.
- "Takes a number" → I recognize how functions accept parameters in Ruby.
- "Adds 5 to it" → I understand basic arithmetic operations in Ruby.
I generalize from related examples
- Even if I’ve never seen a function that adds exactly 5 before, I’ve seen many functions that add numbers in general.
- If I saw an example where a function added 2, I can generalize that concept and modify it to add 5 instead.
I generate the most likely correct answer
- Based on my knowledge of Ruby syntax and arithmetic, I can predict the following:
- Even if I had never seen an exact version of this before, I can construct it using patterns and logical reasoning.
Key Takeaways
✅ I don’t need to have seen the exact function before.
✅ I recognize the underlying programming pattern.
✅ I generalize from similar examples and adjust accordingly.
✅ My response is based on probabilities, syntax rules, and logic rather than memorization.
Would you like to test this by asking me for something slightly more complex? 😃
© 2025 Praveen Puri