Most strategies fail because leaders optimize for harmony instead of truth.
Praveen Puri
President, Puri Consulting LLC
Executive Advisor | Unsticking Complex Projects
I cut through strategic noise so leaders move faster.
© 2025 Praveen Puri
Most strategies fail because leaders optimize for harmony instead of truth.
Praveen Puri
President, Puri Consulting LLC
Executive Advisor | Unsticking Complex Projects
I cut through strategic noise so leaders move faster.
Every over-budget project starts with someone being too polite to challenge nonsense.
Praveen Puri
President, Puri Consulting LLC
Executive Advisor | Unsticking Complex Projects
I cut through strategic noise so leaders move faster.
AI won’t save your strategy. It’s busy writing haikus for middle managers. Ruthless focus, however, will make you untouchable.
Praveen Puri
President, Puri Consulting LLC
Executive Advisor | Unsticking Complex Projects
I cut through strategic noise so leaders move faster.
If your team needs a ‘transformation office,’ it means you’ve already lost control.
Praveen Puri
President, Puri Consulting LLC
Executive Advisor | Unsticking Complex Projects
I cut through strategic noise so leaders move faster.
Big tech projects don’t crash—they suffocate under status updates while everyone lies that ‘we’re on track.’ I call the time of death early.
Praveen Puri
President, Puri Consulting LLC
Executive Advisor | Unsticking Complex Projects
I cut through strategic noise so leaders move faster.
Praveen Puri
President, Puri Consulting LLC
Executive Advisor | Unsticking Complex Projects
I cut through strategic noise so leaders move faster.
If your roadmap needs 80 slides, congratulations! You’ve already lost. I can explain mine on a bar napkin while you’re still finding the clicker.
Praveen Puri
President, Puri Consulting LLC
Executive Advisor | Unsticking Complex Projects
I cut through strategic noise so leaders move faster.
Praveen Puri
President, Puri Consulting LLC
Executive Advisor | Unsticking Complex Projects Fast
A lot of articles these days are focusing on disillusionment with AI and reference the now-infamous MIT report. But, from a historical perspective, this is nothing new and doesn't mean that AI itself will prove useless. All previous major inventions (electricity, cars, personal computers, the internet) had a time gap from when they came out, to when they achieved mainstream adoption. During these gaps, there were a lot of startups, a lot of experimenting, setbacks, and money lost.I suspect the main reason is that, with all these technologies, for businesses to extract the maximum value, they have to make changes to their business processes and strategies. At first, they simply try to use the technology to speed up their existing processes, which weren't designed with the technology in mind.
Today, I read something incredible (I added the bold):
Ford's CEO had an EV wake-up call after tearing apart cars from Tesla and its rivals in China.
Speaking on an upcoming episode of the "Office Hours: Business Edition" podcast, Jim Farley said the "shocking" realization of how far ahead Elon Musk's automaker and China's EV upstarts were pushed him to overhaul the company.
The Detroit executive said Ford's Mustang Mach-E had around 1.6km more electrical wiring than the Tesla, adding extra weight to the car and requiring a much bigger and more expensive battery.
From today's Eric Zorn substack:
It will brighten your day to learn that page B-3 of the weekend print edition of the Wall Street Journal referred to Netflix executive Cindy Holland as “Cindy the Netherlands.”
The use of automated language police officers predates AI, and some of us are still amused to recall how a program installed on the OneNewsNowwebsite of the conservative American Family Association (now American Family News) changed the name of U.S. sprinter Tyson Gay to “Tyson Homosexual” in its coverage of the 2008 Olympic trials.
These developers bought the CBOE building in downtown Chicago for $12 million in June 2024, with the idea of turning it into a datacenter.
They were smart, visionary, and secured more power from Com Ed by applying for a long term deal three years ago, when they were still negotiating for the building, and just before the current AI datacenter craze.
Since everyone wants data centers, it’s now a long process to secure power contracts, so they increased the value of the property.
Now, they flipped the building to another company that wants to build a datacenter for $40 million!
I subscribe to the substack of Eric Zorn, former Chicago Tribune columnist.
In today's issue, one of the items was a language criticism of a recent Chicago Tribune editorial:
the Editorial Board seems either not to know or not to care that “disinterested” is not a synonym for “uninterested,” which is plainly the concept they were going for.
An uninterested person is bored, unconcerned, or indifferent; and a disinterested person is impartial, unbiased, or has no stake in the outcome.
You want the referee of your game to be disinterested. You don’t want the referee to have a bet on the game. As another example, if you’re on trial, you want a disinterested judge.
Here’s how to use these words according to the traditional rules:
Squiggly was uninterested in the Super Bowl. Instead, he was looking forward to the Puppy Bowl.
The ex-wife can hardly be considered a disinterested party in the estate sale.
A study asked a group of doctors this basic #statistics question, and most got it wrong: A rare disease affects 1 out of 1000 people, and the test to detect it has a false positive rate of 5%. If someone tests positive, what is the chance that they actually have the disease?
Can you guess the correct answer?
(To view the answer, just click on the "Show/Hide Answer button" below)